Legal Opinion

In re Johnson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1873PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Howard District Court. The only question in this case is as to the validity of certain statutory provisions, which the district court, at the July Term 1872, held to be unconstitutional. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

The only question presented to us in this case for our consideration is, whether §§ 4, 5 and 6 of the act providing for the sale of school lands, (Gen. Stat., 942, 943, laws of 1871, pp. 315, 316,) are unconstitutional or not. Under said sections Anderson Johnson made an application to the pi’obate court of Howard county, asking to be allowed to purchase a certain quarter-section of school land situated in said county. The probate court entertained the application, heard the questions involved therein, decided the case upon its merits,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winfield Town Co. v. MarisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  3. Sherry v. SampsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  4. Norton v. GrahamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. Clay v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. State ex rel. Godard v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. In re SimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Denton v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  5. Central Loan & Trust Co. v. Campbell Commission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API