Legal Opinion

Woods v. State Ex Rel. Key

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1945No. 8 Div. 320PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Code 1940, Title 29, § 247, rendered the automobile of appellant subject to condemnation in having been used for the illegal transportation of prohibited liquors- or beverages in Franklin, a dry county.

The evidence is without dispute that appellant was conveying bottles of beer in the vehicle, on one of the city streets of Russellville.

The statute in defining liquors and beverages which are prohibited in- dry counties includes among them "“beer * * * and other brewed or fermented liquors and beverages by whatever name called; [and] * * * all * * * beverages made in imitation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Booker v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Cusimano v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Matney v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Thomas v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SpoonerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  2. Tyler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1969
  3. Tucker v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Deerman v. State ex rel. BainsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Kilpatrick v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API