Legal Opinion

Banuelos v. McFarland

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1995No. 94-20258PublishedCited by 214 opinions

1Per curiam

Manuel Banuelos, an inmate of the Texas Department of Corrections, appeals the dismissal of his § 1983 complaint alleging that: 1) his due process rights were violated when as a result of a constitutionally defective disciplinary hearing he lost his privileges and 2) prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. For the following reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

BACKGROUND

Manuel Banuelos, an inmate of the Wynne Correction Facility in Huntsville, Texas, filed this § 1983 action for two separate claims.. First, Banuelos claims that he was not given…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Raymundo R. Mendoza v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Criminal JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by214 opinions

  1. Gobert v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. April Cadena v. El Paso CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  5. Black v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API