Legal Opinion

72A Realty Associates v. Lucas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

In light of the Court of Appeals’ decision in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P. (13 NY3d 270 [2009]) and subsequent case law giving retroactive effect to Roberts (Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P, 89 AD3d 444, 445 [1st Dept 2011]; Gersten v 56 7th Ave. LLC, 88 AD3d 189, 196-197 [1st Dept 2011]), tenant is entitled to rent-stabilized status for the duration of her *402tenancy and to collect any rent overcharges, as her apartment was improperly deregulated by landlord while it was receiving J-51 tax benefits. That the J-51 benefits subsequently expired does not support landlord’s claim that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Gersten v. 56 7th Avenue LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Walsh v. WusinichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API