Legal Opinion

State v. Akers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1998No. 66600-8PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Larry Hendrix (a/k/a Joseph Akers) was convicted of and received an enhanced sentence for one count of delivery of a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of the Seattle School District’s “Youth Education Program” (YEP). On appeal, he argued that application of the school zone enhancement statute violated due process, and that the special verdict form submitted to the jury contained an improper comment on the evidence. The Court of Appeals reversed the enhancement in light of our decision regarding the YEP in State v. Becker, 132 Wn.2d 54, 935 P.2d 1321 (1997). See State v. Akers, 88 Wn.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. AkersWashington Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API