Legal Opinion

McLean v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 21, 1912No. 4392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari; from Bibb superior court—Judge Harris. July 23, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.

Our statute provides that “contracts of an infant under twenty-one years of age axe void, except for necessaries; and for necessaries they»are not valid unless the party furnishing them proves that the parent or guardian fails or refuses to supply the necessaries for the infant.” Civil Code (1910), § 4233. It is practically impossible to lay down any general definition of the term “necessaries” which will be applicable in all cases. That which is a luxury to-day may become a necessity to-morrow. What are deemed necessaries for one person may not be for another. The question depends largely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. Wilborn & McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  2. Nicholson v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Mauldin v. Southern Shorthand & Business UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Brown v. DeloachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  5. Keaton v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Madden v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Geiger v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Hume v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. In Re the Welfare of HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API