McLean v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Bibb superior court—Judge Harris. July 23, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtPottle, J.
Our statute provides that “contracts of an infant under twenty-one years of age axe void, except for necessaries; and for necessaries they»are not valid unless the party furnishing them proves that the parent or guardian fails or refuses to supply the necessaries for the infant.” Civil Code (1910), § 4233. It is practically impossible to lay down any general definition of the term “necessaries” which will be applicable in all cases. That which is a luxury to-day may become a necessity to-morrow. What are deemed necessaries for one person may not be for another. The question depends largely…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nicholson v. Wilborn & McWhorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Nicholson v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Mauldin v. Southern Shorthand & Business UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Brown v. DeloachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Keaton v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Madden v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Geiger v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Hume v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- In Re the Welfare of HudsonWashington Supreme Court · 1942