Legal Opinion

Hall v. Indiana Department of State Revenue

Indiana Tax Court

Decided October 11, 1994No. 49T10-9306-TA-00036PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Judge.

The petitioners, Keith and Mary Hall (the Halls), appeal the final determination of the respondent, the Indiana Department of State Revenue (the Department), assessing controlled substance excise tax (CSET) against the Halls, Like the petitioners in the other three decisions the court hands down today, Clifft v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (1994), Ind.Tax, 641 N.E.2d 682, Bailey v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (1994), Ind.Tax, 641 N.E.2d 695, and Hayse v. Indiana Department of State Revenue (1994), Ind.Tax, 641 N.E.2d 698, the Halls challenge the constitutionality…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bailey v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994
  3. Hayse v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994
  2. Hayse v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994
  3. Hall v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hall v. Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1999
  5. Fassinger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API