Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Caplan

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided January 11, 1995No. Civ. A. 92-2189PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

LITTLE, District Judge.

This case involves claims brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation against former directors of First Bank of Pineville, Louisiana, alleging breach of fiduciary duty of care and loyalty. Before this court is the motion of defendant Randolph A. Monsur for a judgment on the pleadings. Defendant Monsur argues that (1) the FDIC’s complaints are barred by prescription and (2) the FDIC failed to allege specific facts to support its claims.

I. Prescription

Monsur’s prescription argument has two components. First, he argues that the appropriate prescriptive…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Wimberly v. GatchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Texas Investment Bank v. Rockleigh S. Dawson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Noe v. RousselSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  5. Chaney v. State Through Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. HegmannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Beckstrom v. ParnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Sampson v. DCI of AlexandriaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Beckstrom v. ParnellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Maison Royale, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API