Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Ross v. Ragen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1945No. 29001. Motions deniedPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

At a former term, on leave granted, relator filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He alleged that he was unlawfully detained in the custody of .respondent as warden of the Illinois State Penitentiary. Upon consideration the prayer of the petition was granted. The writ of habeas corpus was issued. Respondent has filed his return to the writ. The cause is now pending on the petition and respondent’s return. Relator „now- presents a motion asking this court to appoint counsel to appear for him and to represent him in this proceeding. Í11 the alternative he asks that he be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Bollman and SwartwoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  2. Ex Parte Tom TongSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Vise v. County of HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  4. People Ex Rel. Swolley v. RagenIllinois Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Koss v. SlaterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Master v. BaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Doherty v. CaisleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Darnell v. PeytonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API