Rosenstock v. Board of Supervisors
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from the chancery court of Washington county. IIoN. E. N. Thomas, Chancellor. Bill by Morris Rosenstock. against the board of supervisors and the highway commission of Washington county. Prom a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the bill, complainant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCook, P. J.
This case involves the validity of a proposed issue of nine hundred and fifty thousand dollars of Washington county bonds, for the purpose of building permanent roads, and in turn involves a construction of chapter 176, Laws 1914, and chapter 174, Laws 1916, being the statutes under ■ which Washington county proposes to issue and sell said bonds.
*126The facts are these: Almost immediately after the passage of the act of 1916, to wit, on the 24th of April, 1916, the hoard of supervisors of Washington county were petitioned to submit to the voters of the county the question of a bond issue for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
- Kemp v. Town of HazlehurstMississippi Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lang v. Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
- Giles v. Friendly Finance Company of BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
- Wood v. State Ex Rel. GillespieMississippi Supreme Court · 1932