Legal Opinion

Converse v. Emerson, Talcott & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 24, 1909No. Gen. No. 5,076Published

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Winnebago county; the Hon. Arthur H. Frost, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit in-assumpsit begun by Theodore E. Converse, receiver of the Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Company, appellant, hereinafter called the thresher company, against Emerson, Talcott & Company, appellee, a corporation organized under the laws of Illinois, seeking to recover upon a stock liability under the laws of Minnesota. There is no question raised as to the sufficiency of the pleadings to properly present the question of the liability of the appellee and its defense thereto. The questions involved are questions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. National Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Home Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ottawa v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Converse, Receiver v. Aetna National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  5. Merchants' National Bank of St. Paul v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API