Legal Opinion

Romanesk v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 8, 1968No. [No. 29, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

In this tort action tried in Maryland under Virginia law for personal injuries received by a guest passenger riding in an automobile operated by the owner, the question on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence of gross negligence to allow the jury to determine whether the plaintiff-appellee was entitled to recover damages from the defendant-appellant.

In the early evening of a day in mid-January of 1965, the appellant, Richard A. Romanesk, accompanied by his wife, the appellee, Margo D. Rose, and Guy S. Pizzuto, drove from Palmer, Maryland, to a housewarming party in Arlington,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. White v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Clay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Lilly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Leech v. BeasleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Newell v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Cooper v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Liscombe v. Potomac Edison Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Smith v. Gray Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API