Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Copley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 2019No. COA18-895Published

1DissentArrowood, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling defendant's objection to the portion of the State's closing argument that defendant argues, and the majority agrees, violated defendant's constitutional rights by allowing the State to argue the victim would not have been shot if he had been white. During closing argument, the State argued:

[THE STATE]: And while we're at it ... I have at every turn attempted to not make this what this case is about. And at every turn, jury selection, arguments, evidence, closing argument, there's been this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. TiradoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. TiradoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. MooseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API