Hunt Foods, Inc. v. Basinait
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Kimball and Goldman, JJ. (dissenting).
We think that the Special Term was right in vacating the notice of examination before trial. The order was granted, as stated by the court, on the ground that the information was not "necessary”. It is our opinion that such examination is not authorized at all in a proceeding under article 13 of the Tax Law. The proceeding to review an assessment under the Tax Law is now, and always was, a special proceeding of a statutory nature. It was separate and distinct from the former common law certiorari and, at present, is not a part of or governed by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. MacCracken v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- People ex rel. Four Park Avenue Corp. v. LillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Dubowsky v. GoldsmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- People ex rel. Lehigh Valley Rail Way Co. v. CloverNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- People ex rel. Heller v. HellerNew York Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.