Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided May 8, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. James G. Willard City Attorney City of Apopka Suite 1100 135 West Central Boulevard Post Office Box 640 Orlando, Florida 32802-0640

Dear Mr. Willard:

This is in response to your request on behalf of the City of Apopka for an opinion on substantially the following question:

DOES THE CITY OF APOPKA HAVE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 170, F.S. TO IMPOSE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT UPON THE PROPERTY OF HOMEOWNERS OF A SUBDIVISION TO PAY A PRORATA SHARE OF THE COSTS OF MAINTAINING A DRAINAGE RETENTION POND?

Your letter states that developers of residential subdivisions within the City of Apopka routinely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lainhart v. CattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Anderson v. City of OcalaSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  3. State Ex Rel. Board of Supervisors of South Florida Conservancy District v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  4. Jackson v. City of Lake WorthSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  5. City of Miami v. BrinkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API