Jones v. Citrus Motors Ontario, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
This is an action for damages for injuries sustained when an automobile purchased from defendant suddenly veered into oncoming traffic and collided with another vehicle. Plaintiffs are the surviving occupants of both vehicles. They alleged and defendant denied that defendant’s negligence in repairing the automobile prior to sale was the proximate cause of the collision.
The jury returned a verdict for defendant, and plaintiffs moved for a new trial on several grounds, including insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The court granted the motion. In its three-page…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Hames v. RustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lane v. Hughes Aircraft Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Widener v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Bell v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Resort Video, Ltd. v. Laser Video, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- County of San Diego v. BressiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.