Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Foote

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, J.

The plaintiffs have licenses to operate public dance halls in the town of Evans, granted, in the spring of 1930, by the town board, pursuant to section 222 of the Town Law (added by Laws of 1928, chap. 705, as amd. by Laws of 1930, chap. 161). *402Subsequently, the town board adopted an ordinance which, in terms, forbids Sunday dancing in halls so licensed pursuant to section 222. Thereafter, and in the summer of 1930, complaints were made to the town board by citizens of the town of Evans, asking the revocation of plaintiffs’ licenses. Hearings were held upon these complaints. At a meeting on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kieley v. LentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. People Ex Rel. Kieley v. . LentNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Safee v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Conley v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  5. In re Fybern Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schacht v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API