Wright v. State

The appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted of bur glary, the charging part of the indictment reading as follows:

“Did willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, and burglariously bréale and enter the storehouse of Hamilton & Rodman, a partnership, where goods, wares, merchandise, and other valuable things were kept for sale with the intent of him, the said Charlie Wright, to willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, and burglariously take, steal, and carry away the goods, wares, and merchandise of the said Hamilton and *608Rodman, and he, the said Charlie Wright, did willfully, unlawfully, and…