Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bailey v. Gardner

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1888Published

1Concurrence

Snyder, Judge:

I concur in so much of the foregoing opinion as holds that the deed from A. L. Buffner, trustee, to Catherine Gardner, for the real estate in the bill mentioned, is void as to the *106creditors of the husband of said Catherine; but I do not concur in that portion of the opinion which exempts the improvements placed on the property, since the date of the purchase by Gardner, from liability for the plaintiff’s debt, and confines the relief of the plaintiffs to the value of said property exclusive of the improvements. The cases referred to and relied on in said opinion to sustain the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bright v. BoydU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1841
  2. Rose & Co. v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Core v. CunninghamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Kanawha Valley Bank v. WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Dawson v. GrowWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API