Legal Opinion

Koplin v. Faulkner

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 15, 1956PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMMACK, Judge.

This action was instituted by Monroe Faulkner against Harry Koplin to recover damages for breach of an alleged well-drilling contract. The appeal is from a judgment of $6,000 in favor of Faulkner.

In September of 1952, the parties entered into an agreement whereby the appellee was to drill 20,000 feet of hole for $1.75 per foot in what is generally known as the “Big Sinking Field,” an oil field in Lee, Wolfe, and Powell Counties. This agreement is confirmed by letters to the appel-lee signed by the appellant. Under the agreement the appellant was to “have roads in shape” and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. PreeceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Harness v. Kentucky Fluor Spar Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Benjamin v. DinwiddieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Kirby v. ScrogginsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  5. R. Burleigh & Sons v. OvertonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gollaher v. Midwood Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Brown & Brown of Kentucky, Inc. v. David C. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API