Legal Opinion

Goeller v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 2, 1968No. Gen. 52,117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

Defendant, City of Chicago, appeals from a Declaratory Judgment which ordered that its zoning ordinance as it applied to plaintiffs’ property be declared null and void and held that the plaintiffs could use the premises to construct an apartment building subject to the R4 provisions of the Chicago Zoning Ordinance, with five dwelling units and five parking places in accordance with plans introduced in the case.

The validity of the provisions of the City’s B4-1 classification is put in issue as applied to plaintiffs’ property:

“CHICAGO ZONING ORDINANCE—
“8.3-4 PERMITTED USES—B4-1 to B4-5…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Jacobson v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Lapkus Builders, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Vedovell v. City of NorthlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Village of Mount ProspectAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Hedrich v. Kane CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. La Salle National Bank v. Village of Western SpringsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Willis v. Menard County Board of CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API