Legal Opinion

Lane v. Barron

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue, and the statute of limitation. Replication, a new promise within six years. Pacts agreed.

1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.

The defendant is sued as endorser of notes which, within six years, he promised to pay. The notes were payable to a firm of which he was a member, and were endorsed by the firm, and also by him. If the action is brought against him as surviving partner, another count, declaring against him as an individual endorser, will justly dispose of the question of the capacity in which he made the new promise. The plaintiff’s foreclosure of the mortgage by which the notes were secured was a payment to the amount of the value of the land. Dearborn v. Nelson, 61 N. H. 249; Fletcher v. Chamberlin, 61 N.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
  2. Dearborn v. NelsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tansil v. McCumberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. McKeen v. CookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API