Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Rummerfield v. Watson
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided April 26, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTipton, J.
— The relator, restrained of his liberty on a warrant of the Governor of this State, issued upon a requisition of the Governor of Oklahoma, invokes habeas corpus to effect his release.
Eelator, charged with robbery, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to imprisonment in the Oklahoma penitentiary for a term of five years, on December 31, 1929. In accordance with the laws of that State, he was paroled for a period of ten years on June 13, 1931, which parole was revoked April 19, 1933, for the reason that said relator was received at the Missouri penitentiary on March 23, 1933, to serve a sentence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Drew v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Commonwealth v. Superintendent of Philadelphia County PrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Hughes v. PflanzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Barranger v. BaumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ronnow v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1937
- People Ex Rel. Hesley v. RagenIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
- Loper v. Dees, SheriffMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
- Deering v. MountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Ex Parte Williams v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.