Legal Opinion

Petrova v. Investors Capital

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

*978OPINION OF THE COURT

Francois A. Rivera, J.

Defendants move, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), for an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ summons with notice or, in the alternative, permanently staying this action and compelling the parties to proceed to arbitration before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority pursuant to CPLR 7503 (a).

Plaintiffs submitted no opposition and failed to appear on April 17, 2009 for oral argument on the motion.

On or about January 15, 2008, plaintiffs served defendants with a summons and notice.

Motion Papers

Defendants’ motion consists of an attorney’s affirmation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Clement v. Delaney Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. NGH Associates, Ltd. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API