Conklin v. Cozart
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant’s brief makes some statements not supported by the record. We cannot go outside the record for the facts. The only contention advanced by the petition for habeas corpus is that the tenth count of the indictment under which he is now imprisoned does not charge any offense under 18 U.S.C.A. § 73. The count *677clearly states that the defendant wilfully and falsely forged and counterfeited the indorsement of the payee on a check, in words “S. Weinstein, Weinstein Supply per S. Weinstein,” for the purpose of obtaining and receiving from the United States and their officers and agents the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Prussian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- De Maurez v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Buckner v. AderholdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maye v. PescorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Pina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Maitland E. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963