Legal Opinion

United States v. Vela-Salinas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 17, 2004No. 04-40550PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Luis Ray Vela-Salinas (Vela) appeals the 84-month sentence he received following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful reentry of a deported alien. For the first time on appeal, Vela argues, pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are elements of the offense, not sentencing enhancements, and are unconstitutional. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. De La Cruz-Gonzalez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Cruz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Cruz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. United States v. Vela-SalinasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Vela-SalinasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API