Pritchard v. Panacea Spring Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from 0. H. Guión, J., June Term, 1909, of Vareen. Civil action, beard on exception to referee’s report. From a judgment modifying tbe report, some of tlie unsecured creditors, having excepted, appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
This was an action to wind up an insolvent corporation, or one threatened with insplvency, and make distribution of the assets. A receiver was duly appointed to preserve the property pending litigation, and the cause was referred to ascertain and declare the indebtedness and determine the amount and priority of certain liens, etc. The referee having 'made report, exceptions were filed, and on the hearing the court overruled some of the exceptions, sustained others, in whole or in part, and entered judgment modifying the report accordingly and making distribution of a large part of the assets,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Hailey v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Corporation Commission v. Cannon Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Bradshaw v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Starnes v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- H. L. Beck & Co. v. Bank of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.