Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Slough

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 2017No. 2d Crim. B262102Published

1Dissent

*426YEGAN, Acting P.J., Dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. A heroin peddler sells death. The seller does not necessarily want his customer to die immediately. He or she would prefer that the customer will experience euphoria and return to buy more heroin. But the peddler never quite knows what he is selling. Few, if any, heroin peddlers test their wares in laboratory conditions. A heroin peddler does not sell pharmaceutical grade opiate derivatives. Death, whether instantaneous or after repeated use, is to be expected. The possibility of overdose is always present. Here the victim overdosed on a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burrage v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. People v. CrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API