State v. Moulds
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
Michael Moulds stands accused of theft, burglary and robbery. The district court has entered a suppression order, barring the prosecutor from using as evidence at trial certain statements made by Moulds to police officers during a custodial interrogation. The court held that the statements had been obtained in violation- of Moulds’ constitutional right to have counsel present during the interrogation. The State of Idaho has appealed, contending that police interrogators are not required to honor a request for counsel unless the request is made unequivocally. The State also…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Commonwealth v. HubbleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Carter v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.