Legal Opinion

Bruner v. Palmer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1886No. 12,733PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Josiah C. Palmer and Richard Bruner, being adjoining land-owners, agreed that each should maintain and keep in repair certain specified portions of a partition, fence on the line dividing their lands.

Palmer charged in a complaint filed against Bruner, that while he faithfully performed his part of the agreement, the latter wholly failed, neglected, and refused to maintain in repair that part of the fence allotted to him, under the agreement, but permitted it to go into decay, so that it became-insufficient to protect the crops of each from invasion by the animals of the other.

The complaint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saunders v. HeatonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. BainakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Burck v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Fielo v. BurkitIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Waite v. Siuslaw Boom Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API