Legal Opinion

Hagan v. Scott

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1836PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Western Dist. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, TIIE JUDGE ■ THEREOF PRESIDING. This is an action on a promissory note for three thousand dollars, executed by the firm of Calland & Scott, payable to Hagan & Co., the first of November, 1832, with ten per cent, interest per annum. The petition charges that W. P. Scott had, since the maturity of the note, changed the firm into a new one, of W. P. & J. B. Scott.

Read the full summary

Western Dist. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, TIIE JUDGE ■ THEREOF PRESIDING. This is an action on a promissory note for three thousand dollars, executed by the firm of Calland & Scott, payable to Hagan & Co., the first of November, 1832, with ten per cent, interest per annum. The petition charges that W. P. Scott had, since the maturity of the note, changed the firm into a new one, of W. P. & J. B. Scott. That in October, 1833, W. P. Scott, being in insolvent circumstances, sold all his interest in the stock of merchandize, of W. P. & J. B. Scott, together with all the…

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

This action was brought on a promissory note, executed by J. B. Calland and W. P. Scott, under the style and firm of Calland & Scott. This partnership terminated in the purchase of Calland’s interest, by his partner, W. P. Scott, who afterwards formed a new partnership with J. B. Scott, in which he put the old stock of Calland & Scott; the new partner’s share in the stock being relatively small. He afterwards purchased the interest of W. P. Scott, and his undivided half of a lot of ground.

The plaintiff seeks to make the new partner, J. B. Scott, liable with the makers of the note, on the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maurin & Co. v. RouquerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  2. Flower v. Their CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API