Moore v. State

Seeking reversal of his convictions for possession of cocaine and possession of cannabis, appellant challenges the denial of his motion to suppress. He also appeals *131the sentences imposed, which constituted a departure from the recommended range. We affirm the convictions, but vacate the sentences and remand the cause for resen-tencing.

Reviewing the evidence in a light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress, as we must, State v. Parrish, 470 So.2d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we hold that the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress was not erroneous.…