Legal Opinion

Ward v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 1989No. 89-242Published

1Per curiam

Appellant alleges and appellee concedes the court erred in assessing costs without notice or an opportunity to be heard. This is error. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989). See also Holmes v. State, 547 So.2d 695 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Norden v. State, 548 So.2d 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Clarke v. State, 547 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Donohue v. State, 547 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

The conviction and sentence are affirmed; the costs order is reversed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Holmes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Clarke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Donohue v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Norden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989