Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 1993No. CR93-213PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

A confidential informant told law enforcement officers that appellant was manufacturing phenylacetone, a Schedule II controlled substance, at the residence of David and Shawna Smillie in Nevada County. Acting on that information, the officers executed an affidavit for a warrant to search the Smillie’s residence. The magistrate issued the warrant. The officers searched the house and found appellant with the equipment and chemicals used to produce phenylacetone, commonly called P2P, which is the immediate precursor to amphetamine and methamphetamine. The stench of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Swaite v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Spears v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. West v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. United States v. Jose Oscar CantuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Eastin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API