Legal Opinion
Pierce v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 28, 2004No. 2D04-1753PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
873 So.2d 618 (2004)
Donald PIERCE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 2D04-1753.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
May 28, 2004.
James E. Felman and Katherine Earle Yanes of Kynes, Markman & Felman, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deena DeGenova, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
Donald Pierce petitions this court for a writ of prohibition, contending that the circuit court erred in denying his facially sufficient motion to disqualify the trial judge. A writ of prohibition is the appropriate…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. CobbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Bundy v. RuddSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Hayslip v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- St. Pierre v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- State v. BallardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Pace v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005