Legal Opinion

Luhman v. New York, Westchester & Boston Railway

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Actions to restrain defendant from operating its railroad over certain lots belonging to plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

These two actions were tried separately, but they involve the same question of law. They are brought in equity, to enjoin and restrain the defendant from maintaining and operating its railroad upon and over lots 35 to 52 inclusive, on a certain map entitled “ Map of property situate in the Village and Town of New Rochelle, Westchester County, New York, belonging to the estate of George G. Sickels, deceased, dated September, 1895, and entitled in the action of Daniel E. Sickels, Plaintiff, against Roma M. Mead, et al., and filed in the office of the Register of the said county of Westchester.”

T…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flynn v. New York, Westchester & Boston Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gallon v. HussarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  2. Luhman v. New York, W. & B. Ry. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Diamond v. New York, Westchester & Boston Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API