Legal Opinion

Michelle Gilstrap v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 12, 2013No. 11-55271PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Michelle Gilstrap has difficulty walking because of osteoarthritis and other health problems. She alleges that, on two airplane trips in 2008 and 2009, United Air Lines (“United”) did not provide her with adequate assistance moving through the airport and that she suffered physical and emotional injuries, as a result. Gilstrap sued United, alleging several causes of action under California state tort law and a violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”). Our questions are (1) whether Gilstrap’s state-law claims are preempted by…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. William Castle v. Eurofresh, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. National Federation of the Blind v. United Airlines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Sikkelee Ex Rel. Estate of Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. Kellie Stokes v. Southwest AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  5. Hitoshi Yoshikawa v. Troy SeguirantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API