Legal Opinion
People v. Shaw
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided August 5, 2014PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Judgment of conviction, rendered November 21, 2008, affirmed.
Defendant’s speedy trial motion was properly denied on remand. The dispositive adjournment period between July 17, 2008 (when the court directed a suppression hearing on defendant’s omnibus motion) and September 9, 2008 (the hearing date set by the court) was excludable as a delay attributable to defendant’s motions and court scheduling. While the prosecutor could not have been expected to go forward on July 17 in the event a hearing were ordered and was entitled to a reasonable amount of time to prepare for any…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. TavarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. ForbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- People v. MortozaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2014
- People v. Delgado (Justine)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2018
- People v. Polanco (Manny)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017