United States v. Patryas
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Appellant challenges the judgment solely on the ground that the insured became totally and permanently disabled in the latter part of 1924 which was before the issuance of the converted five year policy. Its position is that the policy which was sued upon did not cover payments for total and permanent disability which occurred prior to the issuance of the policy.
The Government raises no fact question —that is, it does not here question the totality and permanency of the insured’s disability. The record probably justifies this position and would support such a finding by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schmidt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Hicks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. KaminskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- State Mut. Life Assur. Co. v. StappCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. DupireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945