Legal Opinion
State v. Arceo-Rojas
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided February 7, 2020No. 119266PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
No. 119,266 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ERIKA YAZMIN ARCEO-ROJAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Appellate courts use a bifurcated standard of review when considering a motion to suppress evidence. We review the factual underpinnings of the decision for substantial competent evidence, and we review the ultimate legal conclusion drawn from those facts de novo. Substantial competent evidence exists when a reasonable person could accept the evidence as being adequate to support a conclusion. While engaging in this review, we do not reweigh…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Kansas, ex rel. KHP v. $28,350 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
- State v. HamblinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2026