Legal Opinion

James v. United States

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided July 23, 1959No. 1383PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, District Judge.

This is an action wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover from the United States the sum of $1,302.38, being the principal amount of taxes paid on allegedly exempt items, plus $278.13 interest. The government denies that this sum of money was illegally and erroneously assessed and collected. Jurisdiction is conceded.

The pretrial order, as it relates to “admitted facts”, states as follows:

“That the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed plaintiff with an additional $1,302.38 which resulted from the disallowance as a deduction, any amounts expended by plaintiff for…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. George Harvey James v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Harvey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  3. Verner v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1963
  4. Hicks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  5. Sansone v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API