Legal Opinion

Bardill v. Holcomb

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 10, 1968No. 756PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCAIN, Judge.

Appeal is brought by defendants, S. W. and Katherine Bardill, from a final decree granting relief to plaintiffs, Jack N. and Dorothy Jean Holcomb. We reverse.

Plaintiffs and defendants entered into a transaction whereby plaintiffs conveyed to defendants a large tract of land and as partial consideration received from defendants two improved parcels of land. The remainder of the consideration due plaintiffs was agreed to be $90,460.00. The parties decided, however, that a mutual tax advantage could be realized if the transaction were completed strictly as a property exchange.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. E. J. Sparks Enterprises, Inc. v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Nicolaysen v. FlatoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  3. Johnson v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Smart v. BrownleeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carey Canada, Inc. v. California Union InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
  2. Holcomb v. BardillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. Miller v. BalcanoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Reed v. LincolnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Spath v. McLaughlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API