Bardill v. Holcomb
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
McCAIN, Judge.
Appeal is brought by defendants, S. W. and Katherine Bardill, from a final decree granting relief to plaintiffs, Jack N. and Dorothy Jean Holcomb. We reverse.
Plaintiffs and defendants entered into a transaction whereby plaintiffs conveyed to defendants a large tract of land and as partial consideration received from defendants two improved parcels of land. The remainder of the consideration due plaintiffs was agreed to be $90,460.00. The parties decided, however, that a mutual tax advantage could be realized if the transaction were completed strictly as a property exchange.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- E. J. Sparks Enterprises, Inc. v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Nicolaysen v. FlatoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Johnson v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Smart v. BrownleeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carey Canada, Inc. v. California Union InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Holcomb v. BardillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Miller v. BalcanoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Reed v. LincolnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Spath v. McLaughlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.