Legal Opinion

Burges v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1934No. 6840PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

By this petition Burges challenges the ruling of the Board that his salaries as general attorney and general counsel for three irrigation districts were subject to income tax.

There are differences between the facts of this case and Register’s [Register v. Com’r of Internal Revenue (C. C. A.) 69 F.(2d) 607], this day decided adversely to the claimed exemption, but none of them arc significant. Register represented two cities; Burges three irrigation districts, two in Texas, one in New Mexico. Register contracted for a salary and fees; Burges for salary only. Each was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Register v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. ModjeskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  3. Buckner v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Devlin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. Mallory v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API