Legal Opinion

Mangan v. McNair, Mayor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 9, 1936No. Appeal, 77PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The record shows that this proceeding is premature and for that reason cannot be sustained. The relator was employed as typist in the office of the mayor of Pittsburgh. After service in the competitive class — a classification resulting from the Civil Service Act of May 23,1907, P. L. 206, 53 PS section 9361 et seq. — since January, 1929, she was dismissed by the mayor, January 19, 1935. In dismissing her, the mayor did not comply with section 20 of the Act — 53 PS section 9383. On the contrary, he attempted to justify his conduct by insisting that she was no longer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Gum, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Curran v. DelanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Glesenkamp v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Clairton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Taskey v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Scott Township Civil Service Commission AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Intille v. Hoyer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954
  5. McGuckin v. West Homestead BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API