Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Botnick v. Cathedral Healthcare System, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 12, 2005No. 2:97-cv-03073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAVANAUGH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon application by the estate of qui tam Relator Victor Botnick (“Botnick”) for a determination whether his claims to a percentage of the recovery by the Government under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733 (“FCA”), survive his death. After carefully considering the submissions of the parties and based upon the following, it is the finding of this Court that Botnick’s interest in the settlement survives his death. The. Court further finds that Botnick’s claim for reasonable attorney’s fees also survives.

I. BACKGROUND

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Cook County v. United States Ex Rel. ChandlerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. United States v. Medical Consultants, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Bilotta v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. United States Ex Rel. Colucci v. Beth Israel Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Sharp v. Ally Fin., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API