Legal Opinion

Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. Steinman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1915No. Nos. 1266, 1267PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap; Henry Clay McDowell, Judge. Action by A. J. Steinman against the Clinchfield Coal Corporation, in which the Clinchfield Coal Company petitioned to be made a party. There was a judgment for plaintiff against defendant, and a denial of the petition of the Clinchfield Coal Company, and it and defendant separately bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

In this action of ejectment, brought by A. J. Steinman against the Clinchfield Coal Corporation for the coal, iron ore, and other minerals and fire clay on a tract of land of 100 acres, the District Judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff on the ground that the parties claimed title from a common source and that the plaintiff had shown the older conveyance. The questions are somewhat different as to the two parcels known as the “Barrett Tract” and the “Redwine Tract,” which together make up the land described in the declaration.

The plaintiff, Steinman, introduced as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robertson v. PickrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Cooke v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Bolling v. TeelSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  4. Hockman v. McClanahanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  5. Hurley v. CharlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manis v. Farmers Bank of Sullivan CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API