Legal Opinion

Moncivalles v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1987No. 04-86-00437-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUTTS, Justice.

Appeal is from conviction for constructive delivery of heroin. Punishment, which was enhanced, was assessed at 50 years’ imprisonment.

Appellant first assails the sufficiency of the evidence to prove delivery by constructive transfer. The indictment contains two paragraphs, the first charging appellant with actual delivery, and the second with constructive delivery. The State elected to proceed to trial on the constructive delivery allegation, which was, in pertinent part, that appellant did on February 13, 1985:

then and there knowingly and intentionally deliver to MARIO…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Jackson v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Rasmussen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Moncivalles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Leon Wilburn, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005
  5. Leon Wilburn, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API