Legal Opinion

Caso v. Miranda Sambursky Sloane Sklarin Ver Veniotis LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 2017No. 159192/15 3895 3894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered May 26, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss solely to the extent of dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied in its entirety. Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about October 31, 2016, which granted plaintiff’s motion insofar as it sought leave to reargue defendants’ motion to dismiss, denied plaintiff’s motion insofar as it sought leave to renew and to amend the complaint, and, upon reargument of the motion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. MBIA Insurance v. Greystone & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caso v. Miranda Sambursky Slone Sklarin Verveniotis LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API