Legal Opinion

Heusmann v. Priest

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1963No. 31330PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMUEL A. DEW, Special Commissioner.

Otto Heusmann (hereinafter called the claimant) was a police officer of the City of St. Louis, Missouri. On February 23, 1961, he applied to the Board of Trustees of the Alternative Police Retirement System, in effect in that city, for retirement benefits allowable to retired policemen for accidental disability under Section 86.267(1) RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. The Board denied the claim but voted to approve the lesser benefits to the claimant for ordinary disability under Section 86.260, if he should file an application on that basis. Thereafter, on March 1,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crow v. Missouri Implement Tractor CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. Buckner v. Quick Seal, Inc., and Lib. Mut. Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Gegg v. St. Louis Independent Packing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Lofton v. Armour & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vlasak v. Alternative System of the Police Retirement System of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Bergman v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Dodson v. McGauleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Warner v. WurmMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API