Legal Opinion

Potter v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 5, 2015No. 15-569CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se; Rule 12(b)(1), Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; Rule 41(b), Failure to Prosecute; Claims Against a Private Party; 28 U.S.C. § 1631, Motion to Transfer; In Forma Pauperis.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GRIGGSBY, Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Pro se plaintiff, Isaac A. Potter, Jr., brought this action seeking unspecified monetary damages and other relief for alleged misconduct by a private health care services provider in connection with medical treatment provided to his spouse. The government has moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API